نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
The present study has considered the study of comparative law of professionals and for the innovation and efficiency of the research has tried to examine the new principles of comparative administrative law in the reform plan of one of the persons of administrative law in Iran. The research has considered the opportunities and legal challenges of the draft law amending the establishment of the Counseling and Psychology Organization and has tried to organize its research results by focusing on the findings of new comparative law in the administrative field. The results show that despite the efforts of the plan, the legal initiative on the principles of professional ethics, transparency and conflict of interest is still far from the principles of public law.The results show that despite the efforts of the plan, the legal initiative on the principles of professional ethics, transparency and conflict of interest is still far from the principles of public law.
کلیدواژهها English
AlexandrePiraux. La régularisation éthique dans les administrations publiques, Volume I, La régulation éthique par le recours aux valeurs (les idéaux), 2008.
Bernard Asso, Frédéric Monera, avec la collaboration, Julia Hillairet, Alexandra Bousquet. Contentieux administratif .Paris: Levallois-Perret, 2006.
Cane Peter. “Theory and values in public law.” In Law and Administration in Europe. Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow, ed. Paul Craig (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003): 3-22.
Carolan Eoin. The New Separation of Powers. Oxford University Press, 2009.
D.J. Galligan. Due Process and Fair Procedures, Clarendon Oxford, 1996.
Daniel Janet. Éthique de l'administration et du service public, Valeurs et pratiques gestionnaires, ethiquepublique, 2002.
Faigman& David L. The Supreme Court's 200-Year Struggle to Integrate Science and the Law, Laboratory of Justice, 2005.
Fisher Elizabeth. “Transparency and Administrative Law: A Critical Evaluation.” Current Legal Problems 63, no. 1 (Jan 2010): 272-314.
Giulio Napolitano. “Conflicts and strategies in administrative law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 2, (2014): 357-369.
Harlow Carol. “Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values.” European Journal of International Law 17, no. 1 (2006): 187-214.
J.Baldwin, N.Wikeley, R.Young. Judging Social Security, Oxford, 1994.
Kaufman, Daniel et al. “Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4280 (July 2007).
Laubadère, André, Gaudemet, Yves. Traité de droit administratif, 2000, Tome 5.
Mulcahy Linda. “A Visual Turn in Socio-Legal Studies?” Journal of Law and Society 44, 2 (Oct 2017): S111-S128.
Slaughter, Jim, Ragsdale, Gaut, Ericson, Jon L. Notes and Comments on Robert's Rules, Southern Illinois University Press, 2012.
Steffen Roth, Anton Schutz. Ten systems toward a canon of function systems, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 2015.
Timothy H. Jones. “Administrative Law, Regulation, and Legitimacy.” Journal of Law and Society 16, no. 4, (1989): 410-425.
Vaughn Robert G. “Transparency in the Administration of Laws: The Relationship Between Differing Justifications for Transparency and Differing Views of Administrative Law.” American University International Law 26, no. 4 (2011): 969-982.
Vishwanath, Tara, and Daniel Kaufmann. “Towards transparency in finance and governance.” Available at SSRN 258978 (1999).
William V. D'Antonio, Steven A, Tuch. “Voting in Professional Associations: The Case of the American Sociological Association Revisited.” the American Sociologist 22, no. 1, (Apr 1991): 37-48.
Wolfram, Charles. Modern legal ethics, West Publishing Company, 1986.
C.Votes and documents
مجلس شورای اسلامی، طرح اصلاح قانون سازمان نظام روانشناسی و مشاوره جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تاریخ اعلام وصول: 6/7/1399.
شورای مرکزی سازمان روانشناسی و مشاوره، ساختار تشکیلاتی و شرح وظایف، مصوبه جلسه صدوبیستوسوم شورای مرکزی سازمان مورخ 4/ 10/ 1391.
Office of the Federal Register, Document Drafting Handbook, Oct. 1998 revision. See particularly sections 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1.
Conseil d’Etat,(2016) relative à la transparence, à la lutte contre la corruption et à la modernisation de la vie économique, Art. 6 de la loi n° 2016-1691 du 9 décembre 2016.
L'Assemblée nationale et le Sénat ont délibéré (2013) Relative à la transparence de la vie publique LOI n° 2013-907 du 11 octobre 2013.
