نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
In systems of judicial duality and all legal systems that are experiencing a special judge for the administrative cases, the issue of e determining the scope of jurisdiction is always important. This question is not only dependent on the will of the legislator but the judge must also seek the appropriate criteria considering the foundations and requirements of his/her legal system.
In this article, by offering a new classification of criteria for the competence of administrative courts in several countries, and by a critical study, we show that the Iranian administrative judge may adopt which criteria by which reasons.
We present two types of criteria: judicial criteria and administrative criteria. Administrative criteria are related to method, aim, or administrative wrong and the quality of the relationship between government and citizen. Judicial criteria are considered to consist of the nature of remedy sought, nature of the judicial proceedings and personality of the parties.
In France interests of justice rather than administrative criteria are adopted while in Iran jurisdictional criteria are followed. In our opinion, the Iranian judge must not overuse a single type criterion.
کلیدواژهها English
