نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The macro-approaches to judicial review indicate the general orientation of the courts on how to exercise judicial control over administrative actions .In the administrative judicial review literature, three general approaches can be distinguished from each other. The right-based or English approach, which is based more on the red light theory. An organizational-oriented of functionalism or American approach that is based more on green light theory and attention to the requirements of management, efficiency and new public administration. Finally, Hybrid approach or Australian-Canadian models that are more based on the yellow light theory.
The main question is, on what basis and theoretical and practical concerns have each of the aforementioned approaches been formed and developed in administrative law? The basic presumption of this article is based on, the foundations of legal systems in the macro model of judicial review is related to the philosophical foundations of law, human rights, and the separation of powers.
کلیدواژهها English
سیاهۀمنابع
الف- منابع فارسی:
فنازاد، رضا. صلاحیت اختیاری در بستر حقوق عمومی مدرن. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی، 1394.
لاگلین، مارتین. مبانی حقوق عمومی. ترجمۀ محمد راسخ. تهران: انتشارات نی، 1389.
مشهدی، علی. «از عمومی شدن حقوق خصوصی تا خصوصی شدن حقوق عمومی»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق عمومی، شماره 2 (تابستان 1394): 181‑193.
مشهدی، علی. «توجیه و نقد کنترلپذیری صلاحیتهای تخییری قوۀ مجریه»، اطلاع رسانی حقوقی، شمارههای 21 و 22 (1389):61-74.
مشهدی، علی. صلاحیت تخییری. چاپ 1، تهران: انتشارات معاونت حقوقی ریاستجمهوری، 1391.
وکس، ریموند. فلسفۀ حقوق. ترجمۀ باقر انصاری و مسلم آقایی طوق. تهران: انتشارات جنگل، 1389.
هداوند، مهدی. «نظارت قضایی: تحلیل مفهومی، تحولات اساسی»، نشریۀ حقوق اساسی 5، شماره 9 (تابستان 1387): 7-56.
هداوند، مهدی. حقوق اداری تطبیقی. چاپ 1، تهران: انتشارات سمت، 1389.
هداوند، مهدی، مرتضی نجابتخواه، مسلم آقاییطوق، عرفان شمس، مجتبی همتی، هرمز یزدانی، فرهاد جم، و علی مشهدی. آیینهای تصمیمگیری در حقوق اداری (مطالعۀ تطبیقی). تهران: انتشارات خرسندی، 1391.
هداوند، مهدی، و علی مشهدی. اصول حقوق اداری. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی، 1391.
ب- منابع لاتین:
Alder, John. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 3rd edition, London: Macmillan, 1999.
Allan, T. R. S. “Human rights and judicial review: a critique of “due deference”.” The Cambridge Law Journal 65, no. 3 (2006): 695‑671.
Allan, T. R. S. The Limits of Parliamentary Sovereignty. London: Public law, 1996.
Arthurs, Harry W. “Rethinking administrative law: a slightly Dicey business.” Osgoode Hall LJ 17, no. 1 (1979): 1-45.
Cane, Peter, and Mark Tushnet. The oxford Handbook of Legal studies. 2nd published, London: Oxford, 2005.
Cane, Peter. Administrative courts and Tribunals. 1st published, London: Oxford, 2009.
De Smith, S. A., J. L Jowell., S. H Woolf, and A. PLe Sueur. Judicial review of administrative action. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995.
De Ville, J. “The rule of law and judicial review: re-reading Dicey: the constitutional context.” ActaJuridica 2006, no. 1 (2006): 62‑91.
Dicey, A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th edition, E.C.S. Wade. London: Macmillan Co. Ltd, 1959.
Dyzenhaus, David. The unity of public law. Oxford: Oxford and Portland Oregon, 2004.
Galligan, D.J. Discretionary Powers. London: Clarendon. 1990.
Gordon, R. W. “Critical Legal Histories revisited.” Law & SOCIAL inquiry 37, no. 1 (2012): 200‑215.
Grey, T. C. “Judicial review and legal pragmatism.” Wake Forest L. Rev., no. 38 (2003): 473‑489.
Harlow, Carol, and Richard RawLings. Law and Administration. 3rd edition, New York: Cambridge, 2009.
Hertogh, Mark, and Simon Holiday. Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and interdisciplinary perspectives. 1st published, New York: Cambridge University, 2004.
Hiebert, J. L. “A Hybrid-Approach to Protect Rights? An Argument in Favour of Supplementing Canadian Judicial Review with Australia's Model of Parliamentary Scrutiny.” Federal Law Review 26, no. 1 (1998): 115-138.
Jowell, J., and A. Lester. “Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law.” Commonwealth Law Bulletin 14 (1988): 858-870.
Leszczyński, L. “Precedent in the Decision-Making Process. Point of Legal Theory and Judicial Practice.” StudiaIuridicaLublinensia 27, no. 1 (2018): 13-26.
Leyland, Peter, and Gordon Anthony. Textbook on administrative law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Mensah, kwadwo B. “Legal Control Of Discretionary Powers in Ghana: Lessons From English Administrative LawTheory.” African Focus 14, no. 2 (1998): 158‑165.
Pearson, Linda, Carol Harlow, and Michael Taggart. Administrative law in a changing state: essays in honour of Mark Aronson. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008.
Prosser, Tony. “Towards a Critical Public Law.” Journal of Law and Society 9, no. 1 (1982): 25-62.
Rawlings, H. F. “Judicial review and the ‘control of government.” Public administration 64, no. 2 (1986): 135-145.
Smith, David G. “Liberalism and Judicial Review.” American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy 25 (1983): 208-237.
Wade, H.W.R, and C.F. Forsyth. Administrative law. 9th edition, London: Oxford, 2004.
Zarei, Mohammad Hossein. “The Applicability of The Principles of Judicial Review to The Delegated Legislative Powers of Ministers.” PhD diss,. University of Manchester, 1998.
