سیاهۀ منابع
الف- منابع فارسی:
حکمتنیا، محمود. مبانی مالکیت فکری، تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشۀ اسلامی، ]بیتا[.
صادقی، محمود، و منصور خاکپور. «موجبات اعطای مجوز اجباری بهرهبرداری از حقوق مالکیت فکری»، فصلنامۀ مدرس علوم انسانی 11، شماره 4 (1386): 131‑164.
کریمی، عباس، و هادی شعبانی کندسری. «رابطۀ منطقی قاعدۀ فقهی لاضرر و قاعدۀ غربی سوءاستفاده از حق»، فصلنامۀ پژوهشهای تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب 1، شماره 2 (1393): 166‑135.
معینی، حامد و سعیده قاسمیپور. «دکترین سوءاستفاده از حق در مالکیت ادبی و هنری»، فصلنامۀ حقوق پزشکی (ویژهنامۀ حقوق مالکیت فکری) 6 (1391): 187‑208.
میرحسینی، سید حسن. حقوق اختراعات، تهران: میزان، 1387.
ب- منابع لاتین:
Ahmad, Saleh. “Patents: Inventorship Vs Ownership.” Accessed November 21, 2020.
https://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/patents-inventorship-vs-ownership.
Alcatel USA, Incorporated v. Dgi Technologies, Inc. 166 F.3d 772, 1999.
American Patent Act. 35 United States Code, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title35-section154&num=0&edition=prelim
Assessment Technologies of WI, LLC v. WIREdata, Inc. 350 F.3d 640, 2003.
Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. 975 F.2d 832, 1992.
Byers, Michael. “Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age.” McGill Law Journal 47 (2002): 389-431.
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, 293 F. Supp. 892, S.D.N.Y. 1968.
Edwin C. Hettinger, “Justifying Intellectual Property.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, no. 1 (1989): 25‑31.
Goldstrin, Paul. Goldstein On Copyright. 3rd edition, Boston: Aspen Publishers, 2005.
Japanese Law Translation. “Patent Act.” Accessd April 13, 2022.
https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3118/en
Justia. “Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Reynolds (1990).” Accessed January 17, 2020. URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/911/970/14376
Kobak, James B. Intellectual Property Misuse: Licensing and Litigation. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2000.
Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Reynolds, 911 F.2d 970. 1990.
Lunney, Glynn. “Atari Games v. Nintendo: Does a Closed System Violate the Antitrust Laws.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 5, no.1 (1990): 29-73.
M. Witmark and Sons v. Jensen, 80 F. Supp. 843,1948.
Miller, Fredric P., Agnes F. Vandome, and John McBrewster.
Anti-copyright: Anti-copyright, Copyright, Internet, Web 2.0, Information technology, Mashup (digital), Anarchist communism, Competition law, Artificial scarcity, Criticism of intellectual property. [N.P]: Alpha Press, 2009.
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1823438.
Sterling, JAL. World Copyright Law. 2nd edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell. 2003.
Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Jan Busche, and Katrin Arend. WTO - Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Leiden: Max Planck, 2009.
The Department of Commerce. Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy. [N.P]: Createspace Independent, 2014.
Tritton, Guy., and Richard Davis. Intellectual Property in Europe. 3rd edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007.
Video Pipeline, Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entm’t, Inc., 342 F.3d 191, 3d Cir. 2003.
