Feasibility study of accepting renvoi with the difference of conflict resolution rules (Through Using Comparative Law)

Seyedi Arani, Seyed Abbas

doi:10.22096/law.2022.537276.1926

Feasibility study of accepting renvoi with the difference of conflict resolution rules (Through Using Comparative Law)

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Seyed Abbas Seyedi Arani

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Humanities, University of Kashan , Kashan, Iran.

10.22096/law.2022.537276.1926

Abstract

In contrast to national law with the multiplicity of bilateral systems in which they seek to solve the problems of the scope of the law in which the relation is due to its nature. as well as variety of conflict resolution methods,grounds for the emergence and occurrence of renvoi of place of dialogue.With multiple systems. Justification for first-degree renvoi and the principle of accepting second-degree renvoi and with variety of systems its existential principle is problematic.solution can be provided to solve problems by descriptive-analytical method and by using the data of comparative law:In contrast to bilateral systems, one should not insist on one of two criteria"coordination of solutions" and"rule of dispute resolution of the seat of court".What is criterion of being the first to reduce the number of renvoi acceptances much, and thereupon, is reduce in speed and accuracy and obstacle to identification of Votes and the compass point of the second case brings with it the inconsistency of the solutions.In contrast to variety of methods, must be approved unilateral rule,without reference to foreign law, specifies the scope of country's law in place.So if the external rule is unilateral, renvoi and if the Iranian rule is unilateral, if Iranian rule is unilateral,comission and thereupon no renvoi. In the method of purposeful rules and Selection of the Appropriate Law wanted to establish the rule is competent substantive law. In these circumstances, occurrence or continuation of renvoi, depending on the benefit of court headquarters system or cause of such methods, isn’t appropriate.

Keywords

Renvoi

Bilateralism

Unilateralism

Method of purposeful rules

Selection of the Appropriate Law

Bibliography

Almasi, Nejad Ali. Private international law. Tehran: Mizan, 1400. [In Persian]

Amir Moazi, Ahmad. Conflict resolution rules in the law governing contractual obligations. Tehran: Dadgstar, 2011. [In Persian]

Arfa-nia, Behshid. Private international law (conflict of laws). Vol. 2, Tehran: Behtab, 2015. [In Persian]

Batiffol Henri and Paul Lagarde, Droit international privé, Paris: LGDJ, 1993.

Batiffol Henri. Traité de Droit international privé. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1967.

Gothot Pierre and Paul Lagarde " Conflits de lois: principes généraux. " Répertoire de droit international, 2006.

Gutmann Daniel. Droit international privé. Paris: Dalloz, 2007.

Katouzian, Nasser. Civil Law in the Current Legal Order.Tehran: Mizan, 2017.

Khomamizadeh, Farhad. “Variety of Conflict Resolution Rules.” International Law, No. 21 (1376): 44-9. [In Persian]

Lequette Yves. Le renvoi de qualification, Mélanges dédiés à Dominique Hohheaux, Paris: université de Paris II, 1990: (249-262).

Lequette, Yves. »Renvoi«, Répertoire de droit international, (décembre 1998).

Loussouarn Yvon and Pierre Bourel and De Vareilles, Pascal Sommières. Droit international privé. Paris: Dalloz, 2013.

Mayer Pierre and Vincent Heuzé. Droit international privé. Paris: Collection Domat/droit privé, 2014.

Mélin François. Droit international privé. Paris: Lextenso éditions, 2014.

Mohagheg Damad, Seyed Mostafa. Jurisprudential Review of Family Laws: Marriage and Its Dissolution. Tehran: Humanities Publishing Center, 2014. [In Persian]

Niboyet Marie-Laure. Géraud de Geouffre de la Pradelle, Droit international privé. Paris: Lextenso éditions, 2013.

Nikbakht Hamidreza. “Issues raised in the law governing the contract.” Legal Research 7, No. 39, (Spring 2013): 163-201. [In Persian]

Piri, Hamidreza and Nejad Ali Almasi. “Criteria for determining the governing law in case of silence of the parties in international commercial contracts.” Private and Criminal Law Research 14, No. 35, (Spring 2017): 116-81. [In Persian]

Safai Seyed Hossein and Asadollah Emami. Summary of Family Laws. Tehran: Mizan, 2016. [In Persian]

Safai, Seyed Hossein. Discussions of Private International Law, Tehran: Mizan, 2013. [In Persian]

Savigny, F.C VON. Traité de droit romain. trad. Guenoux, Firmin–Didot, 1851.

Seljuqi, Mahmoud. Private International Law. Vol. 2, Tehran: Mizan, 2019. [In Persian]

Seyed Abbas Seyedi Arani. “The role of conflict resolution rules to support conflict resolution methods (with the benefit of comparative law).” Comparative Research of Islamic and Western Laws 6, No. 4, (March 2018): 54-27. [In Persian]

Shahidi, Mahdi. “Iranian rules for determining the law governing private international contracts.” Legal Research Quarterly 1, No. 21-22 (1377): 23-42. [In Persian]

Shaygan, Ali. Civil Rights. Tehran: Mehr Kalam, 2016. [In Persian]

Skini, Rabia. Commercial Law, Commercial Companies. Volume 1, Tehran: Samt, 2018. [In Persian]

Send comment about this article

Name *

Enter Name.

Email Address *

Enter a valid email address.

Affiliation *

Enter a vaid affiliation.

Comments *

Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)

Security Code *