Offensive Decriminalization in  the Field of Terrorist Acts in France

Majidi, Seyyed Mahmood

Offensive Decriminalization in the Field of Terrorist Acts in France

Document Type : Scientific Paper

Author

Seyyed Mahmood Majidi

Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University of Damghan

Abstract

The retreat strategy of penal law was the result of a movement happened in European countries in 1975. Decriminalization of some criminal acts was the most important result of this movement.Consequently, the most important European countries penal policy in line with the mentioned strategy was decriminalization, in addition to two other approaches– diversion and depenalization.

particular area disclose a genuine need for a specialized court? How have the problems been dealt with before the courts? Has there been any important legislation that has prompted or will prompt an increase in the number of cases being litigated in this area over a period of time? Is the volume or potential volume of work in this area sufficient to justify the creation of a specialist court?
In this article I study privileges and defects related to specialized IP courts and also discuss the emerging worldwide trend to establish specialized IP courts and the impact of the specialized IP courts on the protection and enforcement of IP rights and also obstacles related to their creation.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Disputes

Specialized Courts

Privileges

Defects

Obstacles

Conditions

منابع

الف- کتاب‌ها
1. Azibert (Gilbert), Code de procédure pénale, Litec, 17eéd. Paris, 2005.
2. Bouloc (Bernard) et Yves Mayaud, Code pénal commenté, Dalloz, 1eéd. Paris, 1996.
3. Delmas – Marty (Mireille), Procédures d´ Europe, PUF, 1eéd. Paris, 1995.
4. Desportes (Frédéric) et Francis le Gunehec, Droit pénal général, Economica, 9eéd. Paris, 2002.
5. Larguier (Jean), Droit pénal général, Dalloz, 5eéd. Paris, 1995.
6. Larguier (Jean) et Anne – Marie larguier, Droit pénal spécial, Dalloz, 8eéd. 1994.
7. Leclerc (Henri), Le nouveau code pénal, Seuil, 3eéd. Paris, 1994.
8. 8-Mayaud (Yves), Le terrorisme, Dalloz, Paris, 1997
9. Mayaud(Yves), Code pénal commenté, Dalloz, Paris, 1996.
10. Pelletier (Hervé) et Jean Perfetti, Code pénal, Litec, 15eéd. Paris, 2003.
11. Pradel (Jean) et Michel Danti – Juan, Manuel de droit pénal spécial, Cujas. 2eéd. Paris, 1994.
12. Rassat (Michèl – Laure), Procédure pénale, PUF, 2eéd. Paris, 1990.
13. Veron (Michel), Droit pénal spécial, Masson, 6eéd. Paris, 1998.
14. Jeandidier (Wilfrid), Les juridictions pénals d´exeption dans la France contemporaine, p.a.d.s.c. 1985.
15. Gonnard (Jean – Marie), Crimes et délits contre les intérêts fondamentaux de la nation, J.C.P. 1997. Vi, 1197.
16. Marguénnaud (Jean – Pierre), La qualification pénal des actes terrorisme, Rev. sc. Crim. n˚1, 1990.
17. Pradel (Jean), Les infractionsde terrorisme nouvel exemple de L,éclatement du droit pénal, Dr.pén, 1987.
18. Renucci (Jean – François),L´indemnisation des victimes d´actes de terrorisme, Dr.pén, 1987.
ب- مقالات