1
Associate Professor of Law, Imam Hussein University
2
PhD student in International Law, Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract
Should there raise a conflict between the customary rule of States’ Jurisdictional Immunities and a peremptory norm of international law (Jus Cogens), the latter shall prevail. However, the World Court has recently invalidated the rise of such a conflict (Jurisdictional Immunities, Germany v Italy (2012)), maintaining that the rule of immunity is concerned with procedures, while rules of Jus Cogens discuss the substance of rights and obligations. The Court also held that since Germany’s alleged violations were related to the conducts of military forces during the course of armed conflict, thus other exceptions to the rules of State Immunity (Territorial Tort exception) shall not apply. This article will criticize the first reasoning of the Court, arguing that such an absolute distinction between procedures and merits, while maintaining the priority of the former, will lead to absurdity. Then it will turn to the second line of reasoning of the Court and posit that the latter shall be read narrowly as such. The problem of conflict between the peremotory norms of international law and rules of immunity shall be studied in light of victims’ rights, or will otherwise be null. With this orientation, and in keeping with the contingencies of peaceful coexistence, cooperation and harmonization of States’ conducts, this article will propose establishment of international arbitration bodies to which the victims shall have the right to submit cases of torture and seek reparations. Such mechanisms, based on cooperation of States to maintain the fundamental norms to protect human dignity, might show promising in respect to various factors relevant to this question.
الماسی، نجادعلی؛ حقوق بینالملل خصوصی؛ تهران، نشر میزان، چاپ چهارم، 1385.
امینی، اعظم؛ «مفهوم مصونیت قضایی دولتها و استثناء نقض حقوق بشر»، قم، دانشگاه مفید، مجله حقوق تطبیقی، 1389، شماره 79.
شریفی طرازکوهی، حسین؛ قواعد آمره و نظم حقوقی بینالمللی، تهران، دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بینالمللی، 1375.
عبداللهی، محسن؛ میرشافع، شهبیز؛مصونیت قضایی دولت در حقوق بینالملل، تهران، ریاست جمهوری، معاونت پژوهش، تدوین و تنقیح مقررات، چاپ 2دوم، 1386.
عبداللهی، محسن؛ خلیفرضایی، حسین؛ «مسئلة تعارض اصل مصونیت دولت با قواعد آمرة حقوق بشر»، قم، دانشگاه مفید، مجله حقوق تطبیقی، 1389، شماره 79.
فلسفی، هدایتالله؛ صلح جاویدان و حکومت قانون، تهران، فرهنگ نشر نو، 1390.
کاسسه، آنتونیو؛ حقوق بینالملل، ترجمة حسین شریفی طرازکوهی، تهران، نشر میزان، 1385.
کلی، جان؛ تاریخ مختصر تئوری حقوقی در غرب، ترجمة محمد راسخ، تهران، طرح نو، 1382.
Brownlie, I; 1998, Principles of Public International Law, (5th Ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Caplan, L M; 2003, "State Immunity, Human Rights and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory", American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97.
Esposito, C; 2012, "Jus Cogens and Jurisdictional Immunities of States at the International Court of Justice: A Conflict Does Exist", (July 1, 2012),Italian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 21. Available at SSRN – http://ssrn.com/abstract=2103482
Hall, C. K; 2007, "The Duty of States Parties to the Convention against Torture to Provide Procedures Permitting Victims to Recover Reparations for Torture Committed Abroad", in European Journal of International Law, No. 18.
Editorial, MJIL; 2003, "Case Note: Al-Adsani v United Kingdom – State Immunity and Denial of Justice with Respect to Violations of Fundamental Human Rights", in Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2003 (4). Online version available at:
Novogrodsky, N. B; 2007, "Immunity for Torture: Lessons from Bouzari v. Iran", in European Journal of International Law, No. 18.
Orakeshvili, A; 2007, "State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms: Why the House of Lords Got It Wrong?" inEuropean Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 5.
Sciso, E; 2001, "Italian Judges’ Point of View on Foreign States’ Immunity" in Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44.
Talmon, S; 2012, "Jus Cogens after Germany v Italy: Substantive and Procedural Ruls Distinguished", June 16,Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol 25. Available at SSRN – http://ssrn.com/abstract=2085271
Zagor, M; 2012, "Elementary Considerations of Humanity" in The ICJ and Evolution of International Law: the Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (Bannelier et al. (eds.), Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. available at Social Science Research Network: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2089115
Sharifi Tarazkoohi,H. and Modarress Sabzevary,S. (2016). Abrogation of Jursidictional Immunities of State in Cases of Torture and Inhumane Acts. Journal of Comparative Law, 2(2), 65-86.
MLA
Sharifi Tarazkoohi,H. , and Modarress Sabzevary,S. . "Abrogation of Jursidictional Immunities of State in Cases of Torture and Inhumane Acts", Journal of Comparative Law, 2, 2, 2016, 65-86.
HARVARD
Sharifi Tarazkoohi H., Modarress Sabzevary S. (2016). 'Abrogation of Jursidictional Immunities of State in Cases of Torture and Inhumane Acts', Journal of Comparative Law, 2(2), pp. 65-86.
CHICAGO
H. Sharifi Tarazkoohi and S. Modarress Sabzevary, "Abrogation of Jursidictional Immunities of State in Cases of Torture and Inhumane Acts," Journal of Comparative Law, 2 2 (2016): 65-86,
VANCOUVER
Sharifi Tarazkoohi H., Modarress Sabzevary S. Abrogation of Jursidictional Immunities of State in Cases of Torture and Inhumane Acts. Journal of Comparative Law, 2016; 2(2): 65-86.
