Document Type : Research Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Judiciary Research Institute, Tehran, Iran..

Abstract

Error of law of an administrative official means ignorance of the law in the sense that the administrative official has a misunderstanding of the law or gives an interpretation contrary to the purpose of the legislator. But the important issue is how the judicial review occurre. In English law, in the traditional approach, only jurisdictional errors and error of law on the face of the record were reviewable from all types of Intra vires errors, but in the new approach, error of law in the broad sense of ultra vires is one of the causes of judicial review and was abrogated the distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional; so all the errors of law are reviewable. In French law, all types of administrative official’s error of law are reviewable, too. In Iranian administrative law, judicial review on error of law has not been explicitly provided, but it seems that it is possible to use the two bases that provided in the law for judicial review: "legality" and "departure from the limits of authority", although this is not same in the competence of the General Assembly and the branches. In the present research, by studying England and France legal systems in judicial review on error of law, rules and judicial procedure of Iran have been studied and to Identify this concept and judicial review on it, a solution from other legal systems is presented to provide the possibility of judicial review of the administrative official’s error of law in the administrative law of Iran in full.

Keywords

-       Afshari, Fatemeh (2014). “Competent authority to investigate the abuse of authority of an administrative official (a case study of violation of concealment and destruction of government documents by a government official”, Quarterly Opinion: Judicial Opinion Studies, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 17-31. [In Persian]
-       Alder, John (2002). General principles of constitutional and administrative law, 4thEdition, NewYork: Palgrave.
-       Aronson, Mark (2015). “Variable error of law standards?”, In: The Scope and Intensity of Substantive review, draft for H Wilberg and M Elliott, England: Hart Publication, Oxford.
-       Barnett, Hilaire (2007). Constitutional and administrative law, 6thEdition, England: Miltan Park, Routledge, Cavendish.
-       Basioni Abdullah, Abdul Ghani (2006). Judicial Administration, Third Edition, Alexandria: Source of Knowledge. [In Arabic]
-       Bell, John & Others (1998). Princples of French Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
-       Cane, Peter (2011). Administrative Law, 5thEdition, New York: Oxford University Press.
-       Carroll, Alex (2011). Constitutional and administrative law, London & New York: Pearson Longman.
-       Coles, Joanne & Jane Reynolds (2008). Key facts: Constitutional and administrative law, 2ndEdition, London: Holder Arnold.
-       David, Philip Jones & Anne S.de Villars (2009). Principles of Administrative Law, Toronto: Cars well.
-       Dupuis, Georges; Marie-José Gué don & Patrice Chrétien (2000). Droit Administratif, 7thEdition, Paris: Armand Colin.
-       Endicott, Timothy (2011). Administrative law, London: Oxford.
-       Ewing, Keith D & Anthony Wilfred Bradley (1997). Constitutional and Administrative Law, 12th Edition, London & New York: Pearson Longman.
-       Gondouin, Geneviève; Véronique Inserguet-Brisset & Agathe Van Lang (2002). Dictonnaire de droit Administatif, 3rd Edition, Paris: Armand Colin.
-       Hadavand, Mehdi (2008). “Judicial Review: Conceptual Analysis of Fundamental Developments”, Constitutional Law, Vol. 7, No. 9, pp. 7-56. [In Persian]
-       Hadavand, Mehdi (2010). Comparative Administrative Law, Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books. [In Persian]
-         Halliday, Simon (2004). Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law, UK: Hart.
-       Hawke, Neil & Neil Parpworth (1996). Introduction to Administrative Law, London: Sydney: Cavendish.
-       Herling, David & Ann Lyon (2004). Briefcase on Constitutional and administrative Law, 4thEdition, London: Cavendish.
-       Ian, Ellis Jones (2013). Essential administrative law, Tehran: Khorsandi.
-       James, Rhonda & Diane Longley (1999). Administrative JusticeـCentral Issues in UK and European Administrative Law, London-Sydney: RoutledgeـCavendish.
-       Judiciary Research Institute (2013). Judicial review of the exercise of discretionary powers, Tehran: Judiciary Research Institute. [In Persian]
-         Kunnecke, Martina (2007). Tradition and change in administrative law -An Anglo-German Comparison, Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
-       Leberton, Gilles (2007). Droit Administratif General, Paris: Dalloz.
-       LeSuer, Andrew & Maurice Sunkin (1997). Public Law, London: Longman.
-       Lewis, Clive & Barrister Middel Temple (2004). Judicial remedies in public law, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
-       Lombrard, Martine & Gilles Dumont (2009). Droit Administratif, Paris: Dalloz Détournememt De Pouvoin.
-       Loschak, D. (1981). Le principle de légalité, Paris: Mythe et mystification, AJ.D.A.
-       Manfredi, Christopher & Mark Rush (2013). Judging Democracy, Torento: University of Toronto.
-       Martin, Jacqueline & Chris Turner (2007). Constitutional and administrative law, Keycases, London: Hodder Education.
-       Morton, F.L (1988). “Judicial Review in France: A Comparative Analysis”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 89-110.
-       Nejabatkhah, Morteza (2012). Judicial Compensation Methods in Administrative Law of England and Iran, PhD Thesis in Public Law, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
-       Richardson, Elizabeth C. (1996). Administrative Law and Procedure, USA: Delamar.
-       Rivero, Jean & Jean Waline (2002).Droit Administratif, 19thEdition, Paris: Dalloz.
-       Rose-Ackerman, Susan & Peter L. Lindseth (2010). Comparative Administrative Law, Cheltenham and Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
-       Sadr al-Hafazi, Seyyed Nasrollah (1993). Judicial Supervision of Government Actions in the Court of Administrative Justice, Tehran: Shahriyar. [In Persian]
-       Sellick, Joanne (2010). Key Facts constitutional & administrative law, London: Hodder Education.
-         Stott, David & Alexandra Felix (1997).Principles of Administrative Law, London-Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.
-       Tabatabai Motameni, Manouchehr (2011). Administrative Law, 17th edition, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
-       Tabatabai Mutameni, Manouchehr (2008). Comparative Law, Second Edition, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
-       Taggart, Micheal (1997). The Province of Administrative Law, England: Hart.
-       Tolley, Michael C. (2003). “Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes: Deference Doctrines in Comparative Perspectives”, The Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 421-440.
-       Williams, Rebecca (2008). When is an Error not an Error? Reform of Jurisdictional Review of Error of Law and Fact, Pembroke College, England: Oxford.
-       Yardley, D.C.M. (1986). Principles of Administrative Law, 2ndEdition, London: Butter Worths.
-       Yilmaz, Muslum (2013). Domestic judicial review of trade remedies, Experience of the most active WTO members, England: Cambridge University.
 
-       »Droit Administratiffran Cais–DeuxièmePartie–Chapitre2«, Pierre Tifine (2014). Available at: http://www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/blog/2013/08/17/droit-dministratif-francais-deuxieme-partie-chapitre-2/.
-         »Error of Law and the Effects of Flawed Administrative Decisions and Rules«, David Feldman (2014). Available at: http://www.law.cam.ac.uk/ssrn/.
-       »Les Principesgeneraux du droit administratiffrancais et thalandais, Halarchivesouvertes.fr«,  Paleerat Sriwannapruek (2012). Available at: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00719580.
-       »Review for Error of Law: Some Comments«, David Goddard QC (2016). Available at: chambers.co.nz/.../David%20Goddard%20QC%2.
CAPTCHA Image